<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I can beat Rogues.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/</link>
	<description>Fat cows with grounding totems stuck up their ass</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SappyRogue</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>SappyRogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-904</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I can understand not wanting to nitpick over your gear; that’s fine. Furthermore, I’m not berating you for having a suboptimal setup.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;So, I guess I’ve said what I have to say. You seem like an intelligent person that is purposely making a bad decision to prove a point.&lt;/em&gt;

Hooray for backhanded compliments! ...or something.

Seriously, why do people feel the need to tell others how to enjoy their time? I mean seriously, is how you gear your character wasting his $15 a month?  This Mace fellow is exactly the kind of player I tend to avoid.  

Don't pay any mind, if you're winning against Rogues or any other class a good amount of the time then you're obviously doing something right. That's regardless of someone spewing resil facts he read on some &lt;em&gt;actually intelligent&lt;/em&gt; person's theorycraft like he wrote the book.

Resilience to a degree is necessary, but a difference in resilience is a much smaller gap to cross than an difference in skill. Since this guy knows so much I suppose he can start his own blog and tell people what to do with their time there. 

Keep up the good work Smatter, and don't let folks like this get under your skin, it's not worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I can understand not wanting to nitpick over your gear; that’s fine. Furthermore, I’m not berating you for having a suboptimal setup.</em></p>
<p><em>So, I guess I’ve said what I have to say. You seem like an intelligent person that is purposely making a bad decision to prove a point.</em></p>
<p>Hooray for backhanded compliments! &#8230;or something.</p>
<p>Seriously, why do people feel the need to tell others how to enjoy their time? I mean seriously, is how you gear your character wasting his $15 a month?  This Mace fellow is exactly the kind of player I tend to avoid.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t pay any mind, if you&#8217;re winning against Rogues or any other class a good amount of the time then you&#8217;re obviously doing something right. That&#8217;s regardless of someone spewing resil facts he read on some <em>actually intelligent</em> person&#8217;s theorycraft like he wrote the book.</p>
<p>Resilience to a degree is necessary, but a difference in resilience is a much smaller gap to cross than an difference in skill. Since this guy knows so much I suppose he can start his own blog and tell people what to do with their time there. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work Smatter, and don&#8217;t let folks like this get under your skin, it&#8217;s not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolrogue</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>lolrogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-890</guid>
		<description>Comment by nlyav
2008-09-04 03:00:47 
*He will cloak after the first stunlock so you can’t death coil. And if you don’t death coil, the rogue will vanish,*

cloak after ur done with ur stuns, aren't u kinda fucked if the lock doesn't use deathcoil while u pressed cloak right away after the stuns lol. why would the rogue vanish if u dont deathcoil ? he can just keep bashing on u, no need to vanish, use cloak wisely plz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by nlyav<br />
2008-09-04 03:00:47<br />
*He will cloak after the first stunlock so you can’t death coil. And if you don’t death coil, the rogue will vanish,*</p>
<p>cloak after ur done with ur stuns, aren&#8217;t u kinda fucked if the lock doesn&#8217;t use deathcoil while u pressed cloak right away after the stuns lol. why would the rogue vanish if u dont deathcoil ? he can just keep bashing on u, no need to vanish, use cloak wisely plz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolrogue</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>lolrogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-889</guid>
		<description>some caster used this on me, and idd i thought *who the hell uses that, but then again it didn't save him :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some caster used this on me, and idd i thought *who the hell uses that, but then again it didn&#8217;t save him <img src='http://www.locksucks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alians</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Alians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-884</guid>
		<description>same here, i'll just continue to get ganked by them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same here, i&#8217;ll just continue to get ganked by them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-883</guid>
		<description>Here here :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here here <img src='http://www.locksucks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-882</guid>
		<description>The day I roll a Rogue is the day I die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day I roll a Rogue is the day I die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-881</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. I don't agree with your sentiments about PvP, but it is completely personal taste.

However, it sounds like you should have rolled a rogue. They get to use quite a bit of PvE gear in PvP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. I don&#8217;t agree with your sentiments about PvP, but it is completely personal taste.</p>
<p>However, it sounds like you should have rolled a rogue. They get to use quite a bit of PvE gear in PvP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Haha, Drazharan. Well put.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, Drazharan. Well put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drazharan</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Drazharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-878</guid>
		<description>fair enough. anyway, ON WITH THE NEXT ARTICLE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fair enough. anyway, ON WITH THE NEXT ARTICLE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Okay, I'll admit the "AFKs in BGs" remark was a stretch--a poor one on my part.

As I discussed with Horns, I do see how resilience is good. I just wish Blizzard had gone about it a different way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll admit the &#8220;AFKs in BGs&#8221; remark was a stretch&#8211;a poor one on my part.</p>
<p>As I discussed with Horns, I do see how resilience is good. I just wish Blizzard had gone about it a different way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drazharan</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Drazharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-871</guid>
		<description>that last paragraph was riddled with terrible english but you'll figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that last paragraph was riddled with terrible english but you&#8217;ll figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drazharan</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Drazharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-870</guid>
		<description>... the alternative to resilience is what used to happen, with naxx raidtards completely stomping superior players because their gear was flat out better. resilience is the one stat that means PvP is for PvP.

... as for the 'afkers get gear' logic - nobody wants those people getting gear. it's a poor argument, because the system is there to reward people who DO PvP all the time as opposed to people who PvP just as much as say person X who raids and is of an equivalent skill level and, if there was no BG gear, would progress, whereas the PvPer would not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; the alternative to resilience is what used to happen, with naxx raidtards completely stomping superior players because their gear was flat out better. resilience is the one stat that means PvP is for PvP.</p>
<p>&#8230; as for the &#8216;afkers get gear&#8217; logic - nobody wants those people getting gear. it&#8217;s a poor argument, because the system is there to reward people who DO PvP all the time as opposed to people who PvP just as much as say person X who raids and is of an equivalent skill level and, if there was no BG gear, would progress, whereas the PvPer would not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-869</guid>
		<description>Well, I edited the post in response to his comment. :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I edited the post in response to his comment. <img src='http://www.locksucks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-868</guid>
		<description>What I'm trying to say, Mace, is that the state of my gear isn't a super-important factor in my ability to have fun.

YES, you are right. If I were to resocket every stamina gem with +8 resilience, I would have 72 more resilience than I have now. YES, I would die less. YES, I would "win" more. YES, it would be fairly easy for me to do.

Here's the truth, I hate what resilience has done to PvP. I much prefer Vanilla PvP to current PvP. Basing PvP combat around one stat is a bad idea to me. This is the reason for my resentment:

In Vanilla, you would raid, get gear, hit up the BGs and melt face. Now, you raid, hit up the BGs and get clobbered. Why should someone who AFKs/barely participates in BGs get better gear than someone who has devoted his schedule to a guild's progress? Essentially, it's a deep-seated resentment I've held since BC. That's the truth.

I'm not satisfied with the current state of PvP. It's a game of whoever has the most resilience. I like to prove that I don't need to maximize my gear to have fun. THAT'S why I don't go out of my way for PvP gear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;m trying to say, Mace, is that the state of my gear isn&#8217;t a super-important factor in my ability to have fun.</p>
<p>YES, you are right. If I were to resocket every stamina gem with +8 resilience, I would have 72 more resilience than I have now. YES, I would die less. YES, I would &#8220;win&#8221; more. YES, it would be fairly easy for me to do.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the truth, I hate what resilience has done to PvP. I much prefer Vanilla PvP to current PvP. Basing PvP combat around one stat is a bad idea to me. This is the reason for my resentment:</p>
<p>In Vanilla, you would raid, get gear, hit up the BGs and melt face. Now, you raid, hit up the BGs and get clobbered. Why should someone who AFKs/barely participates in BGs get better gear than someone who has devoted his schedule to a guild&#8217;s progress? Essentially, it&#8217;s a deep-seated resentment I&#8217;ve held since BC. That&#8217;s the truth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not satisfied with the current state of PvP. It&#8217;s a game of whoever has the most resilience. I like to prove that I don&#8217;t need to maximize my gear to have fun. THAT&#8217;S why I don&#8217;t go out of my way for PvP gear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeras</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-867</guid>
		<description>It is mentioned in drawbacks that this does not work in Arena. 
Learn to read noob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is mentioned in drawbacks that this does not work in Arena.<br />
Learn to read noob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drazharan</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Drazharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-865</guid>
		<description>http://www.wowhead.com/?talent=Iq0rrofzoZ0xZxx0trothu

I found it highly effective v. rogues. Non-undead anyway. And yes, I have nets.

Essentially, you have a great deal of quick damage at your disposal, and whilst CoEX might be possibly the worst snare in the game, it's still better than none. This spec will become significantly better in Wrath - you can nip the conflagrate stun talent as well as the new buffed CoEX; joy joy.

And against rogues, when you get time to cast anything that isn't fear, immo-&#62;sburn-&#62;conflag. Hell, shadowburn whenever it's off cooldown. Yeah, you eat shards like candy, but no power without cost etc etc.
Besides, conflag is poorly scripted so your latency affects how quick it blows after your immolate lands.

When you land a fear [hopefully against non-undead..else they're retarded, or have bad cooldown luck - who knows or cares, really] throw a shadowbolt then while it's in midair immo-&#62;coex-&#62;conflag. that much damage WILL make them panic clos, and probably lolstep or sprint, so clearly that's the best moment to net and if you can't beat them from that position..something's wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?talent=Iq0rrofzoZ0xZxx0trothu" rel="nofollow">http://www.wowhead.com/?talent.....Zxx0trothu</a></p>
<p>I found it highly effective v. rogues. Non-undead anyway. And yes, I have nets.</p>
<p>Essentially, you have a great deal of quick damage at your disposal, and whilst CoEX might be possibly the worst snare in the game, it&#8217;s still better than none. This spec will become significantly better in Wrath - you can nip the conflagrate stun talent as well as the new buffed CoEX; joy joy.</p>
<p>And against rogues, when you get time to cast anything that isn&#8217;t fear, immo-&gt;sburn-&gt;conflag. Hell, shadowburn whenever it&#8217;s off cooldown. Yeah, you eat shards like candy, but no power without cost etc etc.<br />
Besides, conflag is poorly scripted so your latency affects how quick it blows after your immolate lands.</p>
<p>When you land a fear [hopefully against non-undead..else they're retarded, or have bad cooldown luck - who knows or cares, really] throw a shadowbolt then while it&#8217;s in midair immo-&gt;coex-&gt;conflag. that much damage WILL make them panic clos, and probably lolstep or sprint, so clearly that&#8217;s the best moment to net and if you can&#8217;t beat them from that position..something&#8217;s wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-864</guid>
		<description>I misread what you said about talents (sorry, I thought you said you didn't care about your talents).

However, you hit the nail on the head when you said:

"I play World of Warcraft for FUN."

I can understand not wanting to nitpick over your gear; that's fine. Furthermore, I'm not berating you for having a suboptimal setup. You seem to understand that what you're running is suboptimal, but you are doing it anyways. That's what I don't get. You say you don't want to fuss over your gear, yet you understand what you would need to do to make your setup better. So would it really be nitpicking to just do it?

You say you play WoW for fun. If you socket for resilience you will, with VERY minimal effort:

1) Decrease how much you die.
2) Increase the amount you "win".

I guess that's my point. It would take so little effort to do this, why not just do it?

I can understand not wanting to spend hours farming apexis shards and getting 25 people together just to get a meta gem that is slightly better than one you can AH in 5 seconds. I can understand not wanting to farm gold for hours on end so you can socket all your gear with epic gems. That, IMO, would be nitpicking and it's not for everyone.

So, I guess I've said what I have to say. You seem like an intelligent person that is purposely making a bad decision to prove a point.

Would you honestly not enjoy being more successful? Would you be willing to spend 100g and 2 minutes of your time to find out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I misread what you said about talents (sorry, I thought you said you didn&#8217;t care about your talents).</p>
<p>However, you hit the nail on the head when you said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I play World of Warcraft for FUN.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can understand not wanting to nitpick over your gear; that&#8217;s fine. Furthermore, I&#8217;m not berating you for having a suboptimal setup. You seem to understand that what you&#8217;re running is suboptimal, but you are doing it anyways. That&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t get. You say you don&#8217;t want to fuss over your gear, yet you understand what you would need to do to make your setup better. So would it really be nitpicking to just do it?</p>
<p>You say you play WoW for fun. If you socket for resilience you will, with VERY minimal effort:</p>
<p>1) Decrease how much you die.<br />
2) Increase the amount you &#8220;win&#8221;.</p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s my point. It would take so little effort to do this, why not just do it?</p>
<p>I can understand not wanting to spend hours farming apexis shards and getting 25 people together just to get a meta gem that is slightly better than one you can AH in 5 seconds. I can understand not wanting to farm gold for hours on end so you can socket all your gear with epic gems. That, IMO, would be nitpicking and it&#8217;s not for everyone.</p>
<p>So, I guess I&#8217;ve said what I have to say. You seem like an intelligent person that is purposely making a bad decision to prove a point.</p>
<p>Would you honestly not enjoy being more successful? Would you be willing to spend 100g and 2 minutes of your time to find out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-863</guid>
		<description>Okay, YAWN, I have never beat my friend Nick 1v1 since the introduction of resilience. He is absurdly good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, YAWN, I have never beat my friend Nick 1v1 since the introduction of resilience. He is absurdly good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nlyav</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>nlyav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-862</guid>
		<description>I've never lost to you :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never lost to you <img src='http://www.locksucks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Of course this guide isn't fool-proof. It doesn't work 100% of the time. As I said before, no class can beat another class 100% of the time. I'm not always going to pull the Rogue out of stealth, and I am going to be jumped. This doesn't diminish the usefulness of nets, however.

It's clear to me, nlyav (Or should I say "Vayln"?), that you define real PvP by the Arena. However, BGs were around long before Arena. Regardless of the situation, there's always going to be some scenario-based gimmick that will prevent PvP from being true PvP (see BG scenarios/pillars).

Also, very clever, Nick. :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course this guide isn&#8217;t fool-proof. It doesn&#8217;t work 100% of the time. As I said before, no class can beat another class 100% of the time. I&#8217;m not always going to pull the Rogue out of stealth, and I am going to be jumped. This doesn&#8217;t diminish the usefulness of nets, however.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear to me, nlyav (Or should I say &#8220;Vayln&#8221;?), that you define real PvP by the Arena. However, BGs were around long before Arena. Regardless of the situation, there&#8217;s always going to be some scenario-based gimmick that will prevent PvP from being true PvP (see BG scenarios/pillars).</p>
<p>Also, very clever, Nick. <img src='http://www.locksucks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nlyav</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>nlyav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-860</guid>
		<description>Your guide only works versus rogues that aren't very good.
1. DoT the rogue preferably from a distance can only work if the rogue was pulled out. You might say it is easy because you have perception, but then that is still only for human warlocks. Any rogue who understands pvp will not get pulled out by a warlock pet. The rogue will always get the opener. 
2. Maintaining distance should be the easiest thing for a rogue to not let happen seeing as how there is crippling poison, which any rogue will shiv it instantly if it doesn't auto-proc, and countless stuns.
3. The rogue's health won't get low. Yours will. A good rogue won't cloak when his health is low. He will cloak after the first stunlock so you can't death coil. And if you don't death coil, the rogue will vanish, and then you are at probably around 50% HP (most likely lower) and the rogue is at probably 90% (pet damage) and stealthed again.
4. What rogue wouldn't shadowstep out of netherweave nets to stun? Or even vanish? If the rogue cloaked he has no dots on him, so if he vanishes, your net is on cooldown and the rogue is going to open on you and start all over again. 
This guide was made for warlocks who don't have the gear to survive through large amount of burst and for warlocks who have only had real experience fighting rogues in battlegrounds, not arena. GG newb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your guide only works versus rogues that aren&#8217;t very good.<br />
1. DoT the rogue preferably from a distance can only work if the rogue was pulled out. You might say it is easy because you have perception, but then that is still only for human warlocks. Any rogue who understands pvp will not get pulled out by a warlock pet. The rogue will always get the opener.<br />
2. Maintaining distance should be the easiest thing for a rogue to not let happen seeing as how there is crippling poison, which any rogue will shiv it instantly if it doesn&#8217;t auto-proc, and countless stuns.<br />
3. The rogue&#8217;s health won&#8217;t get low. Yours will. A good rogue won&#8217;t cloak when his health is low. He will cloak after the first stunlock so you can&#8217;t death coil. And if you don&#8217;t death coil, the rogue will vanish, and then you are at probably around 50% HP (most likely lower) and the rogue is at probably 90% (pet damage) and stealthed again.<br />
4. What rogue wouldn&#8217;t shadowstep out of netherweave nets to stun? Or even vanish? If the rogue cloaked he has no dots on him, so if he vanishes, your net is on cooldown and the rogue is going to open on you and start all over again.<br />
This guide was made for warlocks who don&#8217;t have the gear to survive through large amount of burst and for warlocks who have only had real experience fighting rogues in battlegrounds, not arena. GG newb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I haven't considered that spec. It sounds like it could work; I'll give it a shot and get back to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I haven&#8217;t considered that spec. It sounds like it could work; I&#8217;ll give it a shot and get back to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-858</guid>
		<description>I missed the part where I said I didn't care about talents. Putting words in my mouth? I did, however, say that I don't care about other people's talents. 

Furthermore, I also did say that I don't care about my gear; you caught me there. Allow me to rephrase that: I don't stress over gear. The pieces I have are the ones I picked up while PvPing in between raids. I didn't go out of my way to get them or to optimize them.

I would argue that a good PvPer is not determined by his ability to kill his enemy. Where does this leave healers? Sometimes being a good PvPer means knowing when to back out of losing battles, halting your opponent's combos, sacrificing yourself to help the team, and so on.

I do understand that resilience will get me better mileage out of my gear. I don't feel I need to "do better" in PvP combat. I'm content with my successes with my current gear and spec.

You're doing exactly what I hate, Mace: You are berating others because of their talents and gear. This is what turns forums into flamefests. I'm not you. I will never be you. My gear is not optimized. You can't make me optimize it. I'm not you.

I am really perturbed when people develop "I'm an expert at WoW" syndrome (this goes hand-in-hand with the "I'm on the internet; I can be an asshole" syndrome). It seems to me that most people develop this. Why can't we just worry about ourselves? Do you see me digging up your armory to nit-pick? This is what prevents forums from becoming more that "NO U" contests. Instead of seeing what others are doing, worry about yourself.

I play World of Warcraft purely for FUN. Did it ever occur to you that the purpose of this game is fun? I could not care less about about my character's gear and talents so long as I am enjoying the game.

Let it be. If my enjoyment is getting in the way of your enjoyment, I apologize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the part where I said I didn&#8217;t care about talents. Putting words in my mouth? I did, however, say that I don&#8217;t care about other people&#8217;s talents. </p>
<p>Furthermore, I also did say that I don&#8217;t care about my gear; you caught me there. Allow me to rephrase that: I don&#8217;t stress over gear. The pieces I have are the ones I picked up while PvPing in between raids. I didn&#8217;t go out of my way to get them or to optimize them.</p>
<p>I would argue that a good PvPer is not determined by his ability to kill his enemy. Where does this leave healers? Sometimes being a good PvPer means knowing when to back out of losing battles, halting your opponent&#8217;s combos, sacrificing yourself to help the team, and so on.</p>
<p>I do understand that resilience will get me better mileage out of my gear. I don&#8217;t feel I need to &#8220;do better&#8221; in PvP combat. I&#8217;m content with my successes with my current gear and spec.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re doing exactly what I hate, Mace: You are berating others because of their talents and gear. This is what turns forums into flamefests. I&#8217;m not you. I will never be you. My gear is not optimized. You can&#8217;t make me optimize it. I&#8217;m not you.</p>
<p>I am really perturbed when people develop &#8220;I&#8217;m an expert at WoW&#8221; syndrome (this goes hand-in-hand with the &#8220;I&#8217;m on the internet; I can be an asshole&#8221; syndrome). It seems to me that most people develop this. Why can&#8217;t we just worry about ourselves? Do you see me digging up your armory to nit-pick? This is what prevents forums from becoming more that &#8220;NO U&#8221; contests. Instead of seeing what others are doing, worry about yourself.</p>
<p>I play World of Warcraft purely for FUN. Did it ever occur to you that the purpose of this game is fun? I could not care less about about my character&#8217;s gear and talents so long as I am enjoying the game.</p>
<p>Let it be. If my enjoyment is getting in the way of your enjoyment, I apologize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drazharan</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Drazharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-857</guid>
		<description>The issue with these is the same with the engineering trinkets. You're relying on having an advantage the rogue can get just as easily. Even /with/ these they can still catch up. Shadowstep works while netted and it doesn't prevent attacks. It's sort of funny watching 'locks go on about how the engi bubble belt &#62; rogues... then marginally lose to one without one, followed by being completely dominated by one with one.

Also destruction is hardly unplayable. It's just a completely different playstyle to afflic/demo. Try SL+CoEX/conflagrate some time, too, instead of simple cookiecutter shadowfury - it's quite effective provided you're good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with these is the same with the engineering trinkets. You&#8217;re relying on having an advantage the rogue can get just as easily. Even /with/ these they can still catch up. Shadowstep works while netted and it doesn&#8217;t prevent attacks. It&#8217;s sort of funny watching &#8216;locks go on about how the engi bubble belt &gt; rogues&#8230; then marginally lose to one without one, followed by being completely dominated by one with one.</p>
<p>Also destruction is hardly unplayable. It&#8217;s just a completely different playstyle to afflic/demo. Try SL+CoEX/conflagrate some time, too, instead of simple cookiecutter shadowfury - it&#8217;s quite effective provided you&#8217;re good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amaryllis</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Amaryllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-856</guid>
		<description>Yay, im not alone. My priest is addicted to netherweave nets, i seem to use them everytime they are off cooldown. However they do have the negative effect of extremely annoying anyone who gets netted to the point that they ignore everyone else and perscute me. Ah well, its worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, im not alone. My priest is addicted to netherweave nets, i seem to use them everytime they are off cooldown. However they do have the negative effect of extremely annoying anyone who gets netted to the point that they ignore everyone else and perscute me. Ah well, its worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-855</guid>
		<description>I guess I have a hard time seeing where you are coming from. You say that you don't care about gear, and yet you have many battleground pieces. If you truly do not care about gear why wear these at all? Why go to the effort of equipping any items if you don't care about them?

The answer is that you do care. Perhaps not very much, but you do care. And since you must care a little, I still don't see why you wouldn't spend 5 minutes to properly socket your gear considering it took you hours upon hours of farming to get what pvp gear you do have.

You say you are a good pvper. The measure of a good pvper is not some nebulous, nonobjective term. The ability of a pvper is measured by his ability to kill his enemy. This can be done through skill, gear, and talents. You arbitrarily say you don't care about one of those factors. You say that you don't care about talents and yet run a perfect cookie-cutter SL/SL talent spec. See the contradiction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I have a hard time seeing where you are coming from. You say that you don&#8217;t care about gear, and yet you have many battleground pieces. If you truly do not care about gear why wear these at all? Why go to the effort of equipping any items if you don&#8217;t care about them?</p>
<p>The answer is that you do care. Perhaps not very much, but you do care. And since you must care a little, I still don&#8217;t see why you wouldn&#8217;t spend 5 minutes to properly socket your gear considering it took you hours upon hours of farming to get what pvp gear you do have.</p>
<p>You say you are a good pvper. The measure of a good pvper is not some nebulous, nonobjective term. The ability of a pvper is measured by his ability to kill his enemy. This can be done through skill, gear, and talents. You arbitrarily say you don&#8217;t care about one of those factors. You say that you don&#8217;t care about talents and yet run a perfect cookie-cutter SL/SL talent spec. See the contradiction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jandrae</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>Jandrae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-853</guid>
		<description>I love those things! I also PVP as a Warlock and have been using the Netherweave Nets for almost a year now. I use them to keep any melee class at a distance but the most fun I have is using them to capture people trying to run through us on mounts in AV. They also work wonders on flag carriers in WSG.

I'm glad someone else FINALLY mentioned using these things as I've been preaching their gospel forever now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love those things! I also PVP as a Warlock and have been using the Netherweave Nets for almost a year now. I use them to keep any melee class at a distance but the most fun I have is using them to capture people trying to run through us on mounts in AV. They also work wonders on flag carriers in WSG.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad someone else FINALLY mentioned using these things as I&#8217;ve been preaching their gospel forever now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smatter</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>Smatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-852</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you misinterpreted me as well: I don't care about my gear. WoW is something I play casually at this point; I simply don't care enough to optimize my gear because I'm confidant in my ability to play. To quote myself,"PvPing to me means finding what works for me. I don’t care about other people’s specs and gear."

In regards to the health thing: Okay, so I don't always have the most health in a BG. The health thing was a joke on my part. I've noticed, however, that quite frequently I do have the most health in BGs, which is amusing to me because in AV it pretty much says to me: "We've lost this BG."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you misinterpreted me as well: I don&#8217;t care about my gear. WoW is something I play casually at this point; I simply don&#8217;t care enough to optimize my gear because I&#8217;m confidant in my ability to play. To quote myself,&#8221;PvPing to me means finding what works for me. I don’t care about other people’s specs and gear.&#8221;</p>
<p>In regards to the health thing: Okay, so I don&#8217;t always have the most health in a BG. The health thing was a joke on my part. I&#8217;ve noticed, however, that quite frequently I do have the most health in BGs, which is amusing to me because in AV it pretty much says to me: &#8220;We&#8217;ve lost this BG.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horns</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Horns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-851</guid>
		<description>Your first comment got caught as spam for some unknown reason, sorry first time it happened so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your first comment got caught as spam for some unknown reason, sorry first time it happened so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigaras</title>
		<link>http://www.locksucks.com/2008/09/i-can-beat-rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locksucks.com/?p=794#comment-850</guid>
		<description>Very useful when kiting Striders at Vashjs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful when kiting Striders at Vashjs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
